Aerospace Engineering Analysis: China's Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) test (2024)

Aerospace Engineering Analysis: China's Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) test (1)

Table of Contents:

  • Overview

  • Background

    • Ballistic Trajectory

    • Fractional Orbit Bombardment System Trajectory

    • Soviet FOBS System

    • China: FOBS Enters the 21st

    • Hypersonic Glide Vehicle

    • Hypersonic Glide Vehicle Trajectory

    • Implications

  • Assumptions and Caveats:

  • Calculations

    • TLDR

    • Assumptions about calculations

    • Calculations and estimations

  • Conclusion

  • References

Overview:

In 2021, China launched and tested what was labeled a “Fractional Orbital Bombardment System”, or FOBS, according to the Financial Times.

The Engineer's Perspective is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

However, while the FOBS weapon system had origins with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, China’s 2021 test incorporated updates that foreshadowed a weapon that could be the most challenging type of hypersonic weapon to intercept.

In this edition of The Engineer’s Perspective, we will go over the Fractional Orbit Bombardment System, how China modified this Cold War era weapon to create something that is potentially more dangerous, and using open source equations, attempt a basic modeling of this new hypersonic weapon’s behavior.

Background:

We go into the a bit of missile defense terms and history, explaining some background of:

  1. Types of missile trajectories

  2. Where FOBS belongs in all this

  3. And how China upgraded the FOBS system for the 21st century

Ballistic Trajectory

All Ballistic missiles, whether used by the United States, Russia, China, etc. have a single unifying characteristic: All leave the Atmosphere and briefly enter space before descending back to earth under the pull of gravity. An example of a ballistic missile trajectory is shown below:

Aerospace Engineering Analysis: China's Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) test (2)
Fractional Orbital Bombardment System Trajectory:

A FOBS weapon system, unlike a ballistic trajectory, enters an orbit around the planet, de-orbiting through a retro-grade engine burn and reenter the atmosphere just before reaching its target, only then entering a ballistic trajectory:

Aerospace Engineering Analysis: China's Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) test (3)
The Soviet FOBS System

The Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) was initially developed by the Soviet Union as a nuclear weapon delivery system in the 1960s around the time of Sputnik. According to Wikipedia, “ It was one of the first Soviet efforts to use space o deliver nuclear weapons.” Furthemore “The Success of the Soviet Vostok program, which sent a human into orbit, and then landed at a pre-designated location, made [The FOBS-style] weapon seem more feasible.”

The advantages of the FOBS System versus that of the United States Ballistic Missile were that systems launched in this manner, unlike ballistic missiles, could essentially fly over and past traditional missile defense systems, or could even coming in the opposite direction of where traditional missile threats would be expected to come from.

China: FOBS enters the 21st Century

China utilized a Chang Zheng, or “Long March” Rocket:

Aerospace Engineering Analysis: China's Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) test (4)

However, China’s FOBS test differed from the Soviet system by utilizing a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle for a warhead instead of a traditional reentry vehicle:

Hypersonic Glide Vehicle:
Aerospace Engineering Analysis: China's Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) test (5)

A Hypersonic Glide Vehicle is a warhead designed to glide through the upper reaches of the atmosphere at speeds greater than Mach 5. Unlike other types of warheads however, Hypersonic Glide Vehicles exhibit greater range of movement than any other type of Hypersonic Weapon, even ballistic missile warheads. This high level of maneuverability results in a warhead that is more difficult to defeat than other types of warheads.

Hypersonic Glide Vehicle Trajectory
Aerospace Engineering Analysis: China's Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) test (6)

The Hypersonic Glide Vehicle reenters the atmosphere at a lower altitude when compared to an ICBM, allowing it to maneuver around and below the detection systems of current missile defenses. This trajectory allows for the re-entry vehicle to move laterally as well as change altitude in order to attack its target, adding a dimension of difficulty for missile defense systems.

Implications:

The major implications from China’s modification of the FOBS delivery system are three-fold:

  1. Utilizing a method of delivery like FOBS enables a missile to be sent into an orbital trajectory in the opposite direction of where an enemy’s defenses are.

  2. However, combining the FOBS method with a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle, which is more maneuverable than any other hypersonic re-entry vehicle after entering the atmosphere, enables the weapon to maneuver out of range or around, or even below air defenses.

  3. The resulting system’s two methods of maneuverability built into it results in a completely new system that maximizes the opportunities to strike, but minimizes the ability of the system to be defeated.

Assumptions and Caveats

The assumptions I made for this basic-level model are the following:

  • Low Earth Orbit is normally around 300km, or 186 miles

  • The assumed altitude for the FOBS system is below this, at approximately 100km to 200km according to Quest magazine

  • Mach 1 = 700 mph

  • The circumference of the earth is approximately 40,000 km, or 25,000 miles

  • Relevant altitudes traversed by a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle is between 30km-100km

Calculation and Caveats:

TLDR:
  • China’s HGV Flew approximately 29,655km in LEO orbit before de-orbiting, and gliding through the atmosphere for 11,356 km/7040 miles at an average speed of Mach 21 or 6.67km/s

  • Assuming:

    • Calculated LEO Orbital speed is 7.78km/s or Mach 25, meaning the Hypersonic Glide Vehicle would need to drop below Mach 25 to exit orbit and re-enter the atmosphere.

    • Open-source information indicates the Hypersonic Glide Vehicle flew 40,000 km prior to impacting in China, for a total of over 100 minutes.

    • Staying with approximately 100 minutes for the overall flight, the speed of the Hypersonic Glide Vehicle for most of this 40,000 km flight was 24,000 km/h, or 14,814 mph; approximately Mach 21 if Mach 1 is 700mph, which is in line with the calculated orbit speed from above.

Calculation of orbital speed

Orbital speed is the speed at which satellites are moving to remain in orbit over the earth. when in a Low Earth Orbit of between the 160-300km I have bounded for this model. We are assuming that the HGV stayed in Low Earth Orbit.

We can utilize the classic satellite kinematic orbital velocity calculation to estimate this speed.

\(v = \sqrt{\frac{g*M_{central}}{radius}}\)

Where:

g = universal gravitational constant of 6.67*10 to the -11.

Mcentral = Mass of the central body; in this case, earth at 5.97 *10 to the 24 kg

radius = radius of the earth, which is 6.378 *10 to the 6th meters

For our calculations we will use the radius of the earth (6,371km, and add the additional 200km):

\(\sqrt{\frac{(6.67*10^{^-11})*(5.97*10^{24}kg)}{6.578*10^6m}} =7,780m/s= ~7.8km/s\)

The result is approximately 7.8 km/s a second, or around Mach 25, meaning that a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle will need to travel slower than 7.8km/s or Mach 25 in order to return back to earth, otherwise, at 7.78km/s and above at LEO altitude, the system will enter orbit.

Deriving the average speed the Hypersonic Glide Vehicle is moving

Open sources indicate the Glider traveled approximately 40,000km at over 100 minutes.

  1. Going with that we can divide 40,000km by 100 minutes to approximate the amount of miles the glider traveled every 60 seconds, and then multiply that by 60 to derive how many km/h the system was moving:

\(\frac{40000km}{100} =400 km/min; 400km/min * 60 \ minutes = 24000 km/h\)

  1. We can then work with 24,000km/h and convert it to mph and convert that into Mach:

    \(24000 \ km/h *.62 = 14880 mph; \frac{14480 mph}{700} = Mach \ 21.26\)

The result is we find out that the Hypersonic Glide Vehicle is traveling at around Mach 21, which is what we had predicted as a speed below Mach 25 that the system will need to be traveling at.

Calculation for Glide distance:

Taken from Hypersonic Boost Glide Weapons, we will utilize the following Equation to estimate the glide distance of the Chinese HGV test:

\(l_{glide} = \frac {r_e}{2}\frac{L}{D}ln(\frac{1}{1-(\frac{vi}{ve})^2})\)

With the above equation, we will also assume a Lift to Drag ratio L/D of 2.6

\(Where \ v_i = glider's \ initial \ speed, \ and \ v_e\ is \ the \ speed \ of \ a \ satellite \ in \ low \ earth \ orbit \ (derived \ earlier \ as \ 7.78 \ km/s \ , and \ r_e \ is \ radius \ of \ the \ earth) \)

\(v_e = 7.8 \ km/s\)

As we know Ve, we can calculate Vi then from the 24,000km/h, and convert it to km/s:

\(\frac{24000 km/h}{3600} = 6.67 \ km/s\)

\(v_i = 6.67 \ km/s\)

Filling in the blanks then with the equation, we get the following numbers:

\(\frac{r_e}{2} = 3,289 \ km\)

\(\frac{L}{D} = 2.6\)

\(ln(\frac{1}{1- (\frac{6.67km/s}{7.78km/s})^2}) = 1.328\)

And then we input them all into the equation altogether:

\(3,289 \ km * 2.6 * 1.328= 11,536 \ km\)

Assuming the Hypersonic Glide Vehicle has a Lift-to-Drag ratio of 2.6, and that the glider’s initial speed was 6.67 km/s, the Chinese rocket traveled 28,664km, or 17,759 miles while outside of the atmosphere prior to de-orbiting, with the hypersonic glide vehicle then then traveling 11,536 km, or ~7040 miles on the final leg of its journey before impacting in China.

Conclusion:

The Fractional Orbital Bombardment system that China tested in 2021 was a harbinger of the capabilities that near-pear future competitors of the United States could exhibit. The original FOBS weapon system provided the potential of evading traditional missile defense systems by sending a weapon system from the opposite direction that the system is facing.

However, by taking the FOBS weapon system from the Cold War and modifying it to include a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle, the most maneuverable of reentry vehicles. China updated the FOBS system for the 21st century.

Based on the information given, the previous assumptions listed, combined with the open-source calculations, China launched a rocket that traveled approximately 28,664 km or 17,759 miles in Low Earth Orbit before releasing a Hypersonic Glide Vehicle warhead, which then traveled 11,536km, or 7040 miles before impacting in China.

The implication from these calculations indicates that the combination of the two systems creates an intercontinental weapon system without the vulnerabilities that older ballistic missiles present: A weapon that can evade missile defense systems while providing the ability to come from any direction.

References:

The Engineer's Perspective is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Aerospace Engineering Analysis: China's Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) test (2024)

FAQs

What is fractional orbital bombardment FOBS capability? ›

FOBS represented a novel approach to delivering nuclear warheads that aimed to exploit gaps in the nascent U.S. early warning radar network. The core concept was to place a nuclear weapon into a low earth orbit using a powerful rocket, but one that would not complete a full orbit of the planet.

What is the difference between a FOB and an ICBM? ›

[3] FOBS are technologies from the Cold War and ICBMs tend to be the go-to for most advanced militaries. ICBMs can hold larger warheads because they do not need retro rockets to get the warhead out of orbit like the FOBS does. [4] The amount of warheads the vehicle can deliver is still unknown.

What is the fractional orbital bombardment system Russia? ›

In the early 1960s, a revolutionary idea emerged in the Soviet Union to launch nuclear weapons into the low earth orbit and then deorbit (to go out of orbit) at the right time towards its target destination (US cities). This system is known as the fractional orbital bombardment system (FOBS).

Which one of the following statements best reflects the idea behind the fractional orbital bombardment system often talked about in media? ›

Correct Answer: Option c)

Learn more about the Fractional Orbital Bombardment System in the given explanation below. Explanation: The idea behind Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS) is to put a warhead into a stable orbit and deorbit it over the target.

How do you tell if an FOB has a nuke? ›

It'll appear underneath their name. But again, just use the first location to find them. It's located near where it tells you how many troops and platforms each player has. It'll be another symbol right up there with the number of nukes they have.

How powerful is the W87? ›

W87
Specifications
Mass400 to 600 pounds (180 to 270 kg)
Detonation mechanismContact, airburst
Blast yield300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1)
12 more rows

Can a Patriot missile stop an ICBM? ›

Three shorter range tactical anti-ballistic missile systems are currently operational: the U.S. Army Patriot, U.S. Navy Aegis combat system/SM-2 missile, and the Israeli Arrow missile. In general short-range tactical ABMs cannot intercept ICBMs, even if within range (Arrow-3 can intercept ICBMs).

Did Russia build a doomsday device? ›

In 1993 a respected U.S. expert on the Russian military asserted in an interview that the Soviet Union had developed a type of doomsday machine in the early 1980s and that the device was still operative in Russia.

Can we shoot down satellites? ›

Anti-satellite weapons have existed almost as long as satellites have. They are used to destroy or incapacitate satellites, either through physical destruction (crashing into a satellite with a missile or another satellite) or through non-kinetic attacks, such as by electromagnetic jamming, lasers, and cyberattacks.

Are orbital weapons possible? ›

Space-to-Earth weapons would include any orbiting asset that used either kinetic or non-kinetic means to attack or disrupt terrestrial targets. The latter two categories pose difficult technical challenges and are unlikely to be pursued in the short term.

How does orbital bombardment work? ›

A kinetic bombardment or a kinetic orbital strike is the hypothetical act of attacking a planetary surface with an inert kinetic projectile from orbit (orbital bombardment), where the destructive power comes from the kinetic energy of the projectile impacting at very high speeds.

What is the point of bombardment? ›

In its old strict sense the term was only applied to the bombardment of defenceless or undefended objects, houses, public buildings. The purpose is to destroy the courage of your enemies. Civilians in a besieged town would put pressure on their military leaders to surrender before the place was destroyed.

Which of the following was the first method of nuclear weapons delivery? ›

The "Little Boy" and the "Fat Man" devices were large and cumbersome gravity bombs. Historically the first method of nuclear weapons delivery, and the method used in the twin instances of nuclear warfare in history, was a gravity bomb dropped by a plane.

How powerful does a laser need to be to destroy a missile? ›

Lasers in the 100kW-Range Weapons can engage unmanned aircraft, small boats, rockets, artillery, or mortars; while 300kW-Range Weapons can be employed against the side of a cruise missile fuselage to destroy it or knock it off course.

How powerful is Kinetic Bombardment? ›

The idea is that the weapon would inflict damage because it moves at orbital velocities, at least 9 kilometers per second. Smaller weapons can deliver measured amounts of energy as small as a 225 kg conventional bomb. Some systems are quoted as having the yield of a small tactical nuclear bomb.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ms. Lucile Johns

Last Updated:

Views: 6243

Rating: 4 / 5 (41 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ms. Lucile Johns

Birthday: 1999-11-16

Address: Suite 237 56046 Walsh Coves, West Enid, VT 46557

Phone: +59115435987187

Job: Education Supervisor

Hobby: Genealogy, Stone skipping, Skydiving, Nordic skating, Couponing, Coloring, Gardening

Introduction: My name is Ms. Lucile Johns, I am a successful, friendly, friendly, homely, adventurous, handsome, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.